<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>w00tonomy - strategy, content, websites, social media, analysis, content marketing &#187; analytics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.w00tonomy.com/category/analytics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.w00tonomy.com</link>
	<description>We will turbocharge your content to build a long-term relationship with your online audience</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 14:27:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Twitter&#8217;s limitations shown by Harvard study</title>
		<link>http://www.w00tonomy.com/2009/06/twitters-limitations-shown-by-harvard-study/</link>
		<comments>http://www.w00tonomy.com/2009/06/twitters-limitations-shown-by-harvard-study/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 11:08:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>stewart@w00tonomy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[analytics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[useful links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bloggers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[content]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[harvard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[study]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tweets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[users]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.w00tonomy.com/?p=207</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Eager to cut through the hype engulfing Twittwe, some Tefal heads at Harvard Business School have done somerather clever  research into how the microblogging tool is actually used.
First of all, despite what you may have heard, it turns out that Twitter is not the most important invention since fire and, surprisingly, will not bring about [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignright" title="Twitter" src="http://help.twitter.com/attachments/218758" alt="" width="298" height="188" /></p>
<p>Eager to cut through the hype engulfing Twittwe, some Tefal heads at <a href="http://blogs.harvardbusiness.org/cs/2009/06/new_twitter_research_men_follo.html">Harvard Business School have done somerather clever  research into how the microblogging tool is actually used</a>.</p>
<p>First of all, despite what you may have heard, it turns out that Twitter is not the most important invention since fire and, surprisingly, will not bring about universal happiness and peace among all the peoples of the Earth.</p>
<div>The research found that most people using Twitter follow others. It also found that </div>
<div>
<ul>
<li><em>The top 10% of users account for 90% of Tweets (as opposed to most social networks where the top 10% account for 30% of content)</em></li>
<li><em>50% of users update their feeds less than once every 74 days</em></li>
<li><em>Most users make one Tweet and then leave (mind you , on average 60-80% of blogs are abandoned after one month and blogging remains a powerful phenomenon</em></li>
</ul>
</div>
<p>Sounds pretty damning, doesn&#8217;t it? But it depends what you are expecting from Twitter. As a two-way mass communication tool it fails but, in marketing and content-distribution terms, Twitter is incredibly valuable. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s huge: visitors to <a href="http://twitter.com/" target="_blank">twitter.com</a> grew 1,200% from Feb 2008 to Feb 2009 and Twitter has become the third largest social networking site in the US. Where Twitter excels is in narrowcasting relevant information to users who have expressed an interest in your content. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s not a mass communication tool but a way of connecting to specific interest groups.  And targeted content is the Holy Grail of online communication.</p>
<a class="a2a_dd addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save?linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.w00tonomy.com%2F2009%2F06%2Ftwitters-limitations-shown-by-harvard-study%2F&amp;linkname=Twitter%26%238217%3Bs%20limitations%20shown%20by%20Harvard%20study"><img src="http://www.w00tonomy.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_120_16.gif" width="120" height="16" alt="Share/Save/Bookmark"/></a>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.w00tonomy.com/2009/06/twitters-limitations-shown-by-harvard-study/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Both sides now: the joy of clouds</title>
		<link>http://www.w00tonomy.com/2009/02/both-sides-now-the-joy-of-clouds/</link>
		<comments>http://www.w00tonomy.com/2009/02/both-sides-now-the-joy-of-clouds/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 10:07:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>stewart@w00tonomy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[analytics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clouds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[keywords]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[menus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[navigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tags]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxonomy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.w00tonomy.com/?p=184</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Moons and Junes and Ferris wheels, the dizzy dancing way you feel and so on and so forth.
Clouds, we love &#8216;em.
We are not here speaking of  thecumulonimbus aggregations of water molecules that are such a feature of Scottish skies but rather the images used to display key terms on a site (or indeed any other [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignright" style="float: right;" src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3492/3254672139_4df733948e.jpg?v=0" alt="w00tonomy cloud" width="250" height="136" />Moons and Junes and Ferris wheels, the dizzy dancing way you feel and so on and so forth.</p>
<p>Clouds, we love &#8216;em.</p>
<p>We are not here speaking of  thecumulonimbus aggregations of water molecules that are such a feature of Scottish skies but rather the images used to display key terms on a site (or indeed any other collections of words).</p>
<p>We like them because navigation is the key challenge online – and it&#8217;s mostly not a challenge that is satisfactorily met by IT taxonomies or rigid hierarchies of data.</p>
<p>Clouds tend to reflect how humans or content behave – either by showing the most popular pieces of content or the most numerous or the most searched for. They present the results in a user-friendly attractive way.</p>
<p>Your browser may not support display of this image.All of which means we&#8217;re thrilled to have discovered <a title="wordle" href="http://www.wordle.net">Wordle</a> . It allows you to create your own clouds, based on text you enter or its search of key terms on a website of your choosing. You can then play around with how the words are displayed: horizontal, jangled up, black and white, coloured. It&#8217;s a great way of getting to grips with what clouds are.Your browser may not support display of this image.</p>
<a class="a2a_dd addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save?linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.w00tonomy.com%2F2009%2F02%2Fboth-sides-now-the-joy-of-clouds%2F&amp;linkname=Both%20sides%20now%3A%20the%20joy%20of%20clouds"><img src="http://www.w00tonomy.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_120_16.gif" width="120" height="16" alt="Share/Save/Bookmark"/></a>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.w00tonomy.com/2009/02/both-sides-now-the-joy-of-clouds/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Content Marketing Watch &#8211; improvements to Google Analytics</title>
		<link>http://www.w00tonomy.com/2008/10/content-marketing-watch-improvements-to-google-analytics/</link>
		<comments>http://www.w00tonomy.com/2008/10/content-marketing-watch-improvements-to-google-analytics/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 11:25:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[analytics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[content marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[useful links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[audience segmentation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[content marketing watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[content optimisation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google analytics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[segmentation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.w00tonomy.com/?p=148</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Content Marketing Watch is the latest feature section to be added to our interviews and opinion pieces. For those of you in the industry who are looking to maximise the most value from the content on your site each week we will have a piece on the latest industry news; covering areas of content marketing [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong><span style="color: #800080;"><em>Content Marketing Watch</em></span></strong><em> is the latest feature section to be added to our interviews and opinion pieces. For those of you in the industry who are looking to maximise the most value from the content on your site each week we will have a piece on the </em><strong><span style="color: #800080;"><em>latest industry news</em></span></strong><em>; covering areas of content marketing such as analytics, internet marketing, content optimisation, search engine marketing and digital communications.</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.w00tonomy.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/adv_seg.png"><img class="alignright" title="Google Analytics advance segmentation" src="http://www.w00tonomy.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/adv_seg.png" alt="Advanced Segmentation" width="252" height="212" /></a>An essential element to optimising you site content is having the right measurement tools. <a href="http://www.google.com/analytics/"><strong><span style="color: #800080;">Google </span></strong></a><a href="http://www.google.com/analytics/"><strong><span style="color: #800080;">Analytics</span></strong></a> seems to get better and better and the rational of using its free service instead of a licence product is becoming more compelling, especially in these hard times. Recently Google has announced 7 new improvements to Google Analytics that will see it become more like an enterprise solution. If you are current Google Analytics user then you should see these enhancements rolled out over the next few weeks. The new enterpise features are</p>
<ul>
<li>Improvements to the user interface</li>
<li>Improvements to the management interface</li>
<li>Integration with adsense</li>
<li>Custom reporting</li>
<li>Advanced segmentation</li>
<li>Motion charts</li>
<li>New API</li>
</ul>
<p>Google has created a few videos in its <a href="http://uk.youtube.com/view_play_list?p=AFDC0271A9E3C759">YouTube channel</a> to help explain these changes in more detail. <strong><span style="color: #800080;">We particluarly like the video on the new motion charts.</span></strong></p>
<a class="a2a_dd addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save?linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.w00tonomy.com%2F2008%2F10%2Fcontent-marketing-watch-improvements-to-google-analytics%2F&amp;linkname=Content%20Marketing%20Watch%20%26%238211%3B%20improvements%20to%20Google%20Analytics"><img src="http://www.w00tonomy.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_120_16.gif" width="120" height="16" alt="Share/Save/Bookmark"/></a>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.w00tonomy.com/2008/10/content-marketing-watch-improvements-to-google-analytics/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is online market research worth the bother?</title>
		<link>http://www.w00tonomy.com/2008/10/is-online-market-research-worth-the-bother/</link>
		<comments>http://www.w00tonomy.com/2008/10/is-online-market-research-worth-the-bother/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2008 16:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[analytics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[content]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[content marketing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.w00tonomy.com/?p=147</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Before the online age, advertisers placed great store on customer demographics, opinions and attitudes, behavior, geography, media consumption and the like. Advertising agencies created advertising campaigns to target particular audience groups for their clients &#8211; often with considerable success. 
Now we have online marketing, content marketing, digital marketing and mobile marketing. But it would seem [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt;">Before the online age, advertisers placed great store on customer demographics, opinions and attitudes, behavior, geography, media consumption and the like.<span> </span>Advertising agencies created advertising campaigns to target particular audience groups for their clients &#8211; often with considerable success. </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Now we have online marketing, content marketing, digital marketing and mobile marketing. But it would seem that advertisers know less about their online audience than they do of their offline audience.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt;">It is not uncommon for example for media buying agencies to place online ads in Print Media newspaper websites based on the offline audience readership metrics – the assumption being that the online and offline audience must be similar.<span> </span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt;">Well, what do you know; it looks like <a href="http://www.w00tonomy.com/why-w00tonomy/"><strong><span style="color: #800080;">it pays to research your online audience</span></strong></a>.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt;">It turns out The Telegraph and Guardian Unlimited websites do indeed attract the same readers online and offline, however The Sun, The Times and the Daily Mail attract a much broader online audience. <a title="Heather's article - Newspaper Audience Comparison Online v Offline" href="http://weblogs.hitwise.com/heather-hopkins/2007/03/newspaper_audience_comparison_1.html">Heather Hopkins</a> of Hitwise brought this to our attention in 2007 – yes, I know, it’s old news, but I rediscovered it yesterday whilst I was doing some research for one of our clients. We often talk about the value of providing access to your archive of &#8220;old news&#8221;, its one of the principles of content marketing, <strong><span style="color: #800080;">if it’s online someone will find it and find it useful</span></strong>. </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt;">If you are interested in researching you audience you may end up using the services of companies such as <a title="Hitwise" href="http://www.hitwise.co.uk/">Hitwise</a>, <a title="Nielson Online" href="http://www.nielsen-online.com/">Nielsen Online</a> <a title="Comscore" href="http://www.comscore.com">comScore</a> and <a title="quantcast" href="http://www.quantcast.com">quantcast</a>. If you have a significant audience based in the </span><span style="font-size: 10pt;">United States</span><span style="font-size: 10pt;">, you might be interested in checking out the audience profile for your site on <a title="quantcast" href="http://www.quantcast.com">quantcast</a>.<span> </span>Also you might want to have a look at their new service the <a title="quantcast media planner" href="http://www.quantcast.com/planner">media planner</a> allowing advertisers to target audience by age, gender, income, ethnicity and education. The service is free and is focused on US Internet audiences, however ‘<a title="quantcast quantified publishers" href="http://www.quantcast.com/docs/quantified-publisher">Quantified Publishers</a>’ can get access to breakdowns of their audience from around the world.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt;">Now, getting back to researching the audience for that social marketing campaign, what is the difference between the US and </span><span style="font-size: 10pt;">UK</span><span style="font-size: 10pt;"> population browsing habits for a particular demographic? I was tempted to assume there would be significant similarities but what do you know…..<span> </span></span></p>
<a class="a2a_dd addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save?linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.w00tonomy.com%2F2008%2F10%2Fis-online-market-research-worth-the-bother%2F&amp;linkname=Is%20online%20market%20research%20worth%20the%20bother%3F"><img src="http://www.w00tonomy.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_120_16.gif" width="120" height="16" alt="Share/Save/Bookmark"/></a>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.w00tonomy.com/2008/10/is-online-market-research-worth-the-bother/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Se7en deadly sins of online &#8211; WRATH</title>
		<link>http://www.w00tonomy.com/2008/05/se7en-deadly-sins-of-online-wrath/</link>
		<comments>http://www.w00tonomy.com/2008/05/se7en-deadly-sins-of-online-wrath/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 20:16:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[analytics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[content marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[humour]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public sector]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[audience focussed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[content]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[redesign]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[se7en sins]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[usability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wrath]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.w00tonomy.com/?p=116</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[WRATH &#8211; blaming the customer for not caring
The last sin in our series happens when all that excitement over your site launch is a distant memory and you start to hear the murmurings of another site redesign. The lack of post launch editorial planning has started to destroy that great design that you agonised over. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h2><span style="color: #800080;">WRATH &#8211; blaming the customer for not caring</span></h2>
<p><img class="alignright" style="float: right;" src="http://www.brisbanetimes.com.au/ffximage/pacino_wideweb__470x314,2.jpg" alt="" width="267" height="178" />The last sin in our series happens when all that excitement over your site launch is a distant memory and you start to hear the murmurings of <span style="color: #800080;"><strong>another</strong></span> site redesign. The lack of post launch editorial planning has started to destroy that great design that you agonised over. As the content has been lumped onto the site the usability has been lost and customers complain that they can&#8217;t find the information they need. The analytics which were a key part of your business case to support the site development budget have become just another spreadsheet of numbers that are reported each month &#8211; no follow-up action and no progress. And a recent customer survey that you ran online your customers say that they find your competitor&#8217;s site better and easier to use.</p>
<p>This is when the defensive rage starts to kick-in. The problem is not yours, it&#8217;s the customers. They don&#8217;t really understand your business; there are very few people interested in your content and it is very dry and uninspiring so it is not surprising nobody wants to read it. And finally your customers don&#8217;t really like to use net anyway. Over the years we at w00tonomy have heard all of these. If any of these are true then you should probably question why you built a site in the first place.</p>
<p>The reality is that away from the jargon and Internet speak, carrying out your business online is no different from any other aspect of what you do -<span style="color: #800080;"><strong> <a href="http://www.w00tonomy.com/why-w00tonomy/">it has to be audience focused</a></strong></span>. People want things that add value to their lives. People like stories and dislike advertising. People like to build trust through relationships over time. People like to learn through interaction. People like to be in control and not be interrupted. What makes online so different is that it condenses all of these experiences onto a single screen.</p>
<p>This why we at w00tonomy are driven by the belief that <strong><span style="color: #800080;">&#8220;every business has story to tell each one of its customers&#8221;</span></strong> and why it is the most effective and only way to build long-term relationships online.</p>
<a class="a2a_dd addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save?linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.w00tonomy.com%2F2008%2F05%2Fse7en-deadly-sins-of-online-wrath%2F&amp;linkname=Se7en%20deadly%20sins%20of%20online%20%26%238211%3B%20WRATH"><img src="http://www.w00tonomy.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_120_16.gif" width="120" height="16" alt="Share/Save/Bookmark"/></a>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.w00tonomy.com/2008/05/se7en-deadly-sins-of-online-wrath/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Se7en deadly sins of online &#8211; GREED</title>
		<link>http://www.w00tonomy.com/2008/05/se7en-deadly-sins-of-online-greed/</link>
		<comments>http://www.w00tonomy.com/2008/05/se7en-deadly-sins-of-online-greed/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 May 2008 22:05:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[analytics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[content marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public sector]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Avinash Kaushik]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[greed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intelligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[se7en sins]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[traffic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[traffic analysis]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.w00tonomy.com/?p=115</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[GREED &#8211; lots of data no intelligence
You can have too much of a good thing. It has often been commented that online wins over offline because it offers real time feedback of people&#8217;s behaviour. This is true, but what is provided is something like this
Page views 10,000; Unique visitors 3000; click through rates 10%; bounce rates 3%; [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h2><span style="color: #800080;">GREED &#8211; lots of data no intelligence</span></h2>
<p>You can have too much of a good thing. It has often been commented that online wins over offline because it offers real time feedback of people&#8217;s behaviour. This is true, but what is provided is something like this</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><em>Page views 10,000; Unique visitors 3000; click through rates 10%; bounce rates 3%; 55% of search engine traffic from Google; Top ten search terms are&#8230;</em></p>
<p>What does that actually tell us? The answer is very little &#8211; it gives no real understanding of who is visiting a site and what they are doing.</p>
<p>The reason so many businesses accept this quality of reporting (and so many agencies provide it to clients) is simple. With the sophistication of analytics software now available in the market place (Google Analytics, HBX, Omniture, etc) <strong><span style="color: #800080;">production of data is cheap but intelligence is expensive</span></strong>.</p>
<p>For this reason businesses and agencies are often <strong><span style="color: #800080;">greedy for data and do not invest the time and effort to turn data into intelligence.</span></strong> Without this investment they try to substitute volumes of data for insight &#8211; the intelligence must be in there somewhere so no-one can complain they never saw it.</p>
<p>Data will not help when you evolve your online strategy. Instead any changes you make will be a gamble that will be based on a hunch or the HIPPO effect (HIghest Paid Person&#8217;s Opinion) described by <a href="http://www.kaushik.net/avinash/">Avinash Kaushik</a>.</p>
<p>In order for the cycle of <strong><span style="color: #800080;"><a href="http://www.w00tonomy.com/why-w00tonomy/">measure and evolve</a></span></strong> to work effectively your digital marketing strategy should be driven not by the greed for more data but by intelligent analysis making clear recommendations. In. Plain. English.</p>
<a class="a2a_dd addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save?linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.w00tonomy.com%2F2008%2F05%2Fse7en-deadly-sins-of-online-greed%2F&amp;linkname=Se7en%20deadly%20sins%20of%20online%20%26%238211%3B%20GREED"><img src="http://www.w00tonomy.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_120_16.gif" width="120" height="16" alt="Share/Save/Bookmark"/></a>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.w00tonomy.com/2008/05/se7en-deadly-sins-of-online-greed/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

